29% Antimony Rock Chips Identified in Drake Project Review
Released
Released
Announcement PDF
ASX Announcement
16 September 2024
29% Antimony Rock Chips Identified in Drake Project Review
Extensive High-Grade Antimony-Gold (Sb-Au) Rock Chips over the Lunatic Field i
Caledonian Reef:
29.2% Sb, 3.1g/t Au, 46g/t Ag (80/M179)
Hugh & Jackson Reef:
20.4% Sb, 1.8g/t Au (80/M176), 15.8% Sb, 0.25g/t Au (62145)
Deep Creek Sb Vein:
7.1% Sb, 0.55g/t Au (62147)
Victoria Reefs:
39.0g/t Au, 4g/t Ag (113919), 7.7g/t Au, 7g/t Ag (113917)
Collins Mine:
63.4g/t Au, 6g/t Ag (62140), 56g/t Au, 3g/t Ag (62141)
Orange Tree:
5g/t Au, 3g/t Ag, 310ppm Sb (62143)
New England Fold Belt - One of Australia’s Premier Antimony Provinces
The Lunatic Field, within the Drake Project, hosts several occurrences of ‘Hillgrove style’ antimony-gold
mineralisation. The Lunatic Field is located approximately 190km north of Larvotto Resources’ Hillgrove
Mine (LRV: ASX), one of the top ten largest global antimony resources and Australia’s largest Sb deposit ii.
Discovery Opportunity
•
There has been no drilling at Drake targeting antimony since 2006, when 19 shallow (<100m) and widespaced Reverse Circulation (RC) holes were drilled in the area to test the historic antimony workings. iii
•
Many drill holes intercepted previously mined areas (stopes), with reports indicating that the lode
widths ranged up to 3m with a 2-3m mineralisation halo on either side of the main interpreted lode iv.
•
The antimony field covers an area of approximately 5km2 with historic reports indicating that some
workings extend discontinuously for up to 1.6km (Lunatic Prospect and Johnson’s Prospect)iv.
•
These workings include open-cut trenching and shallow underground development to 86miv.
Strategic and Critical Mineral Status
Antimony is classified as a Critical Mineral by the USA and Australia and was recently subject to Chinese
export restrictions, resulting in an increase in the antimony price to approximately circa USD$25,000/tii.
Management comment – Legacy Minerals CEO & Managing Director Christopher Byrne said:
“As we progress with our ongoing review of the Drake Project, the discovery potential continues to impress
our exploration team. In addition to Drake’s more well-known copper, gold and silver prospects, these highgrade antimony and gold numbers from the Lunatic Field – up to 29.2% Sb and 63.4g/t Au – demonstrate
an area of untested potential and exploration upside for the critical resource of antimony.
“The pedigree of the New England Fold Belt to host significant antimony-gold resources is supported by the
Hillgrove Mine, which is situated 190km to the south of the Lunatic Field. The Hillgrove mine is Australia’s
largest antimony resource and among the 10th largest in the world.
“We see this as another excellent discovery opportunity, with the last significant exploration and drilling
having been conducted in 2006, when antimony prices were US$3,650/tonne. With China’s recent
restriction on antimony exports and antimony’s critical role in high-technology equipment, this strategic
mineral has become even more important now with prices rising recently to approximately $24,000/tonne.
“Legacy Minerals continues to unpack the Drake Project and looks forward to providing further updates to
our shareholders.”
Page 1 of 16 | ABN 43 650 398 897
3/202 Russel Street Bathurst, 2795
www.legacyminerals.com.au
ASX: LGM
Page 2 of 16
Legacy Minerals Holdings Limited (ASX: LGM, “the Company” or “Legacy Minerals”) is pleased to advise
that it has identified significant high-grade antimony mineralisation following the review of historical
exploration at its 100%-owned Drake Project (EL6273, EL9616, and ELA6642) located in NSW, Australia.
Drake Antimony Review
The rock sample results include historical pre-1989 exploration results. The exploration activity was
undertaken from 1980-1982 (pre-JORC) by Western Mining Company Ltd, individual licence holders and
government geologists. As per ASX requirements for reporting pre-1989 historical data, LGM notes that
the results (the Former Exploration Results) are not reported in accordance with the JORC Code 2012 as a
competent person has not done sufficient work to disclose the exploration results in accordance with the
JORC Code 2012. It is possible that, following further evaluation and/or exploration work, the confidence
in the prior Former Exploration Results may be reduced when reported under the JORC Code 2012. While
nothing has come to LGM's attention that questions the accuracy or reliability of the former exploration
results, LGM has not independently validated them.
Nevertheless, the levels of antimony reported in the Former Exploration Results are a key factor in guiding
LGM’s exploration strategy regarding the Drake Projects. Proposed verification work includes further
sampling, which LGM expects to undertake in 2024 using existing funds. Relevant original exploration
reports can be found in the references section of this report.
Figure 1: Lunatic Field, EL9616, with historical rock chip sampling and workings over solid geology
interpretation.
SIGN UP TO LEGACY MINERALS’
INTERACTIVE INVESTOR HUB
ASX: LGM
Page 3 of 16
Figure 2: Drake Caldera and location of the Lunatic Field and other major prospects
SIGN UP TO LEGACY MINERALS’
INTERACTIVE INVESTOR HUB
ASX: LGM
Page 4 of 16
Antimony Market Overview v
4F
The global antimony market is currently experiencing a period of significant disruption driven by China's
recent decision to impose export controls on antimony ore, metal, oxides and associated smelting and
separation technologies commencing from 15 September 2024.
Antimony is classified as a critical mineral by the UK, EU, US, Japan, and other key economies. Antimony's
versatile applications span various industries, including its significant use in flame retardants, lead-acid
batteries, glass manufacturing and as a critical alloy in ammunition. Its strategic importance extends to
military applications such as infrared missile guidance systems, night vision equipment, and nuclear
weapons – positioning it as a vital element in national security frameworks.
As the world’s dominant producer, supplying nearly 50% of global antimony, China’s actions have tightened
market conditions and pushed prices to recent highs of USD$25,000/mt basis 99.65% (Ingot) FOB China vi.
These controls are expected to further increase market volatility and underscore the strategic importance
of antimony, which is classified as a critical mineral by the UK, EU, US, Japan, and other key economies due
to supply concentration risks.
5F
Drake Exploration Plan
A request has been made to the Geological Survey of New South Wales to have the Malachite
Resources Ltd reports released pertaining to historic drilling conducted on the Lunatic Antimony Field.
It is the Company’s understanding there has been no drilling at the project since 2006, when 19 RC
holes were drilled by Malachite Resources Ltd in the area to test the historic antimony workings. vii
Available reports state that many drill-holes stopes, indicating that the lode widths ranged up to 3m
with a 2-3m mineralisation halo on either side of the main interpreted lode viii. The Company will
incorporate this information, when made available, prior to drill testing.
The Company has completed its initial phase of database compilation for the Drake Project, including
all historical surface and drilling assays. Compilation is ongoing with regard to historical geological
maps and mining activities. Historic geophysical surveys are also currently under review to assess the
extent of the requirements for remodelling and interpretation.
6F
7F
Based on the outcome of these reassessments of the historical geophysical surveys and a review of
geochemical data, the Company will determine the need for any further geophysical or surface
geochemistry prior to drill testing.
Summary of the Drake Project
Geology
The Drake Project sits within the highly prospective New England Fold Belt, one of a number of
epithermal gold, silver and base metal districts that formed along the east coast of Australia during
the Permian age as back arc extensional volcanic basins.
A number of major mines and deposits occur within the NEFB, including the Hillgrove Mine (1.0Moz
Au, 93kt Sbii), Cracow gold mine (2.5Moz Au @ 4.97g/t) ix, Mt Carlton gold mine (1.2Moz Au, 12Moz
Ag) x, Mt Rawdon gold mine (2.5Moz Au xi), and Mt Morgan (8Moz Au xii).
8F
9F
10F
1F
The Lunatic Field lies along a north-south zone about midway between the Demon Fault and the
western margin of the Clarence Moreton Basin and may be structurally related to either of these
features. The Lunatic Field comprises a western belt of antimony and eastern belt of gold deposits
with mineralised veins hosted by Emu Creek Formation sediments and at Ottos lode (Pretty Gully) by
Jenny Lind Granite.
SIGN UP TO LEGACY MINERALS’
INTERACTIVE INVESTOR HUB
ASX: LGM
Page 5 of 16
The Drake epithermal deposits are hosted by the Drake Volcanics, a NW-trending 60km x 10km
Permian bimodal volcano-sedimentary sequence within the Wandsworth Volcanic Group near the
north-eastern margins of the Southern New England Fold Belt.
The Drake Volcanics overlies or is structurally bounded by the Carboniferous Early Permian
sedimentary Emu Creek Formation to the east and bounded by the Demon Fault and Early Triassic
Stanthorpe Monzogranite pluton to the west.
The sequence is largely dominated by andesite and equivalent volcaniclastics, however basaltic
through to rhyolitic facies stratigraphic sequences are present, with numerous contemporaneous
andesite to rhyolite sub-volcanic units intruding the sequence.
The Razorback Creek Mudstone underlies the Drake Volcanics to the east, and Gilgurry Mudstone
conformably overlies the Drake Volcanic sequence. In addition, Permian and Triassic granitoid plutons
and associated igneous bodies intrude the area, several associated with small scale intrusion-related
mineralisation xiii.
12F
The Drake Volcanic sequence and associated intrusive rocks are host and interpreted source to the
volcanogenic epithermal Au-Ag-Cu-Pb-Zn mineralisation developed at Mt Carrington. The majority of
the Drake Volcanics and associated mineralisation are centred within a large-scale circular caldera
with a low magnetic signature which is 20km diameter.
Previous exploration is limited to regional geophysics and surface geochemical sampling including
stream sediment sampling, rock chip sampling, soil sampling and drill testing. The Project is centred
on a poorly understood but regionally important, low-sulphidation, epithermal, gold, silver, zinc and
copper mineralised system.
The Porgera Goldfield provides a good analogy to Drake in that gold-silver associated with galenasphalerite forms marginal to felsic-intermediate domes, although in different host rocks. Many recent
discoveries feature settings where veins occur only in competent host rocks which have fractured well
but are obscured by overlying incompetent host rocks (El Penon, Chile; Palmarejo, Mexico; Hishikari,
Japan). Major structures which might be considered include the NS corridor at Red Rock North and
another NS major break in the gravity data at the southern caldera margin xiv.
13F
Figure 3: Location of the Drake Project in the New England Fold Belt with significant mineral deposits.
SIGN UP TO LEGACY MINERALS’
INTERACTIVE INVESTOR HUB
ASX: LGM
Page 6 of 16
Approved by the Board of Legacy Minerals Holdings Limited.
For more information:
Investors:
Chris Byrne
CEO & Managing Director
chris.byrne@legacyminerals.com.au
+61 (0) 499 527 547
Media:
Nicholas Read
Read Corporate
nicholas@readcorporate.com.au
+61 (0) 419 929 046
DISCLAIMER AND PREVIOUSLY REPORTED INFORMATION
Information in this announcement is extracted from reports lodged as market announcements referred to above and
available on the Company’s website https://legacyminerals.com.au/. The Company confirms that it is not aware of any new
information that materially affects the information included in the original market announcement and that all material
assumptions and technical parameters underpinning the estimates in the relevant market announcement continue to apply
and have not materially changed.
This announcement contains certain forward-looking statements. Forward looking statements are only predictions and are
subject to risks, uncertainties and assumptions which are outside of the control of Legacy Minerals Holdings Limited (LGM).
These risks, uncertainties and assumptions include commodity prices, currency fluctuations, economic and financial market
conditions, environmental risks and legislative, fiscal or regulatory developments, political risks, project delay, approvals and
cost estimates. Actual values, results or events may be materially different to those contained in this announcement. Given
these uncertainties, readers are cautioned not to place reliance on forward-looking statements. Any forward-looking
statements in this announcement reflect the views of LGM only at the date of this announcement. Subject to any continuing
obligations under applicable laws and ASX Listing Rules, LGM does not undertake any obligation to update or revise any
information or any of the forward-looking statements in this announcement to reflect changes in events, conditions or
circumstances on which any forward-looking statements is based.
COMPETENT PERSON’S STATEMENT
The information in this Report that relates to Exploration Targets, Exploration Results, Mineral Resources or Ore Reserves is
based on information compiled by Thomas Wall, a Competent Person who is a Member of the Australian Institute of
Geoscientists. Mr Wall is the Technical Director and a full-time employee of Legacy Minerals Pty Limited, the Company’s
wholly-owned subsidiary, and a shareholder of the Company. Mr Wall has sufficient experience that is relevant to the style
of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity being undertaken to qualify as a Competent
Person as defined in the 2012 edition of the Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and
Ore Reserves. Mr Wall consents to the inclusion of the matters based on this information in the form and context in which
it appears in this announcement.
SIGN UP TO LEGACY MINERALS’
INTERACTIVE INVESTOR HUB
ASX: LGM
Page 7 of 16
About Legacy Minerals
Legacy Minerals is an ASX listed public company that has been involved in the acquisition and exploration of gold, copper,
and base-metal projects in NSW since 2017. The Company has eight projects that present significant discovery opportunities
for shareholders.
0BAu-Ag Black Range (EL9464, EL9589)
Extensive low-sulphidation, epithermal system with
limited historical exploration. Epithermal occurrences
across 30km of strike.
1BCu-Au Drake (EL6273, EL9616, ELA6642)
Large caldera (~150km2) with similar geological
characteristics to other major pacific rim low-sulphidation
deposits.
2BCu-Au Rockley (EL8926)
3B Au-Cu (Pb-Zn) Cobar (EL9511) Helix JV
Prospective for porphyry Cu-Au and situated in the
Macquarie Arc Ordovician host rocks with historic highgrade copper mines that graded up to 23% Cu.
Undrilled targets next door to the Peak Gold Mines.
Several priority geophysical anomalies and gold in lag up
to 1.55g/t Au.
Au-Ag Bauloora (EL8994, EL9464) Newmont JV
One of NSW’s largest low-sulphidation, epithermal
systems with a 27km2 epithermal vein field.
Cu-Au Glenlogan (EL9614) S2 Resources JV
Large, undrilled magnetic anomaly underneath Silurian
cover located 55kms from Cadia Valley.
6B Au Harden (EL9657)
Large historical high-grade quartz-vein gold
mineralisation. Drilling includes 3.6m at 21.7g/t Au 116m
and 2m at 17.17g/t Au from 111m.
Au-Cu Fontenoy (EL8995) Earth AI Alliance
An 8km long zone of Au and Cu anomalism defined in soil
sampling and drilling. Significant drill intercepts include
79m at 0.27% Cu from 1.5m.
4BCCu-Au Thomson (EL9190, EL9194, ELA6777)
Prospective for intrusion-related gold and copper systems the project contains numerous ‘bullseye’ magnetic and
gravity anomalies that remain untested.
Figure 4: Location of Legacy Minerals’ Projects in NSW, Australia xv
14F
SIGN UP TO LEGACY MINERALS’
INTERACTIVE INVESTOR HUB
ASX: LGM
Page 8 of 16
Appendix 1 - Highlight Rock Chip Results
Table 1: Highlight Rock Chip Results (AGD66/z56)
Sample ID Easting Northing Au ppm Ag ppm
Sb ppm
80/M179
443889
6810410
3.1
46
292,000
500
1000
80/M176
442100
6809400
1.8
<1
204,000
80
50
62145
442100
6809400
0.25
3
158,000
200
60
62147
442400
6808600
0.55
<1
71,000
22
28
62140
443840
6808800
63.4
6
2,100
32
120
62143
443900
6809500
5
3
310
26
18
62141
443840
6808800
56
3
180
46
26
113919
443400
6806950
39
4
No assay.
130
50
113917
443400
6806950
7.7
7
120
160
Cu ppm Pb ppm
No assay.
Stibnite logged.
Appendix 2 – Drake Project Mineral Resource
Table 2: Mineral Resource Estimate on EL6273 and ELA6642 as of 26 March 2024.
Deposit
Resource
Classification
Indicated (JORC
2012)
Strauss
Inferred (JORC
2012)
Indicated (JORC
2012)
Kylo
Inferred (JORC
2012)
Sub-Total
Inferred (JORC
Red Rock
2004)
Inferred (JORC
Guy Bell
2004)
Sub-Total
Lady
Hampden
White Rock
White Rock
North
Indicated (JORC
2004)
Inferred (JORC
2004)
Indicated (JORC
2004)
Inferred (JORC
2004)
Inferred (JORC
2004)
Grade
Au
Ag
(g/t)
(g/t)
Au
(koz)
Metal
Ag
Zn
(koz)
(kt)
Zn
(%)
Cu
(%)
Cu
(kt)
2.2
1.48
1.74
0.49
0.08
105
123
10.7
1.7
1.36
0.69
1.81
0.33
0.06
30
79
4.4
0.9
2.14
1.25
1.35
0.19
0.04
86
93
4.1
0.8
0.3
0.41
1.17
0.18
0.05
4
11
0.5
0.1
6
1.17
1.59
0.33
0.06
225
306
19.8
3.5
1.63
1.6
2.2
54
182
0.16
2.5
4.9
13
24
1.79
1.2
3.6
67
206
1.84
0.6
69
37
4056
2.47
0.3
51
27
4023
Tonnes
(Mt)
1.71
77
4214
2.66
47
3978
3.18
52
5314
SIGN UP TO LEGACY MINERALS’
INTERACTIVE INVESTOR HUB
ASX: LGM
Page 9 of 16
Inferred (JORC
2004)
Sub-Total
8.95
Total (JORC 2012 + JORC 2004)
16.74
Silver King
0.64
59
0.1
51
1218
64
22803
356
23315
The Strauss and Kylo Mineral Resources have been estimated using a gold cut-off of 0.3g/t Au and
25g/t Ag, 0.1% Cu, 0.1% Pb, and 0.1% Zn. The Guy Bell Mineral Resource has been estimated using a
cut-off of 0.5g/t Au and Red Rock has been estimated using a 0.7g/t Au cut-off. Silver dominant
Mineral Resources (Lady Hampden, White Rock, White Rock North, and Silver King) have been
estimated using a cut-off of 25g/t Ag. The Red Rock, Guy Bell, Lady Hampden, White Rock, White Rock
North, and Silver King Mineral Resources was prepared and reported in accordance with the JORC
Code (2004). The Resources figures have not been updated since to comply with the JORC Code 2012
on the basis that the information has not materially changed since it was last reported.
Appendix 3 – JORC Code, 2021 Edition Table 1
Section 1 Sampling Techniques and Data
Criteria
Sampling
Techniques
Drilling
techniques
JORC Code Explanation
Commentary
Nature and quality of sampling (e.g., cut
channels, random chips, or specific
specialised industry standard
measurement tools appropriate to the
minerals under investigation, such as down
hole gamma sondes, or handheld XRF
instruments, etc). These examples should
not be taken as limiting the broad meaning
of sampling.
All results are historical in nature. No sampling by
LGM has been conducted on the tenement.
Include reference to measures taken to
ensure sample representivity and the
appropriate calibration of any
measurement tools or systems used.
All results are historical in nature. No sampling by
LGM has been conducted on the tenement.
Aspects of the determination of
mineralisation that are Material to the
Public Report. In cases where ‘industry
standard’ work has been done this would
be relatively simple (e.g. ‘reverse
circulation drilling was used to obtain 1m
samples from which 3 kg was pulverised to
produce a 30 g charge for fire assay’). In
other cases more explanation may be
required, such as where there is coarse
gold that has inherent sampling problems.
Unusual commodities or mineralisation
types (e.g., submarine nodules) may
warrant disclosure of detailed information.
All results are historical in nature. No sampling by
LGM has been conducted on the tenement.
Drill type (e.g., core, reverse circulation,
open‐hole hammer, rotary air blast, auger,
Bangka, sonic, etc) and details (e.g. core
diametre, triple or standard tube, depth of
diamond tails, facesampling bit or other
type, whether core is oriented and if so, by
what method, etc).
No drilling by LGM has been conducted on the
tenements. Historical drilling (AC, RC & Diamond) has
been conducted across the project area, the
verification and validation of these data sets is
ongoing.
SIGN UP TO LEGACY MINERALS’
INTERACTIVE INVESTOR HUB
ASX: LGM
Page 10 of 16
Drill sample
recovery
Logging
Sub‐sampling
techniques and
sample
preparation
Method of recording and assessing core
and chip sample recoveries and results
assessed.
No drilling by LGM has been conducted on the
tenements. Historical drilling (AC, RC & Diamond) has
been conducted across the project area, the
verification and validation of these data sets is
ongoing.
Measures taken to maximise sample
recovery and ensure representative nature
of the samples.
No drilling by LGM has been conducted on the
tenements. Historical drilling (AC, RC & Diamond) has
been conducted across the project area, the
verification and validation of these data sets is
ongoing.
Whether a relationship exists between
sample recovery and grade and whether
sample bias may have occurred due to
preferential loss/gain of fine/coarse
material.
No drilling by LGM has been conducted on the
tenements. Historical drilling (AC, RC & Diamond) has
been conducted across the project area, the
verification and validation of these data sets is
ongoing.
Whether core and chip samples have been
geologically and geotechnically logged to a
level of detail to support appropriate
Mineral Resource estimation, mining
studies and metallurgical studies.
No drilling by LGM has been conducted on the
tenements. Historical drilling (AC, RC & Diamond) has
been conducted across the project area, the
verification and validation of these data sets is
ongoing.
Whether logging is qualitative or
quantitative in nature. Core (or costean,
channel, etc) photography.
No drilling by LGM has been conducted on the
tenements. Historical drilling (AC, RC & Diamond) has
been conducted across the project area, the
verification and validation of these data sets is
ongoing.
The total length and percentage of the
relevant intersections logged.
No drilling by LGM has been conducted on the
tenements. Historical drilling (AC, RC & Diamond) has
been conducted across the project area, the
verification and validation of these data sets is
ongoing.
If core, whether cut or sawn and whether
quarter, half or all core taken.
No drilling by LGM has been conducted on the
tenements. Historical drilling (AC, RC & Diamond) has
been conducted across the project area, the
verification and validation of these data sets is
ongoing.
If non‐core, whether riffled, tube sampled,
rotary split, etc and whether sampled wet
or dry.
No drilling by LGM has been conducted on the
tenements. Historical drilling (AC, RC & Diamond) has
been conducted across the project area, the
verification and validation of these data sets is
ongoing.
For all sample types, the nature, quality
and appropriateness of the sample
preparation technique.
No drilling by LGM has been conducted on the
tenements. Historical drilling (AC, RC & Diamond) has
been conducted across the project area, the
verification and validation of these data sets is
ongoing.
Quality control procedures adopted for all
subsampling stages to maximise
representivity of samples.
No drilling by LGM has been conducted on the
tenements. Historical drilling (AC, RC & Diamond) has
been conducted across the project area, the
verification and validation of these data sets is
ongoing.
Measures taken to ensure that the
sampling is representative of the in situ
material collected, including for instance
results for field duplicate/second‐half
sampling.
No drilling by LGM has been conducted on the
tenements. Historical drilling (AC, RC & Diamond) has
been conducted across the project area, the
verification and validation of these data sets is
ongoing.
SIGN UP TO LEGACY MINERALS’
INTERACTIVE INVESTOR HUB
ASX: LGM
Page 11 of 16
Whether sample sizes are appropriate to
the grain size of the material being
sampled.
The nature, quality and appropriateness of
the assaying and laboratory procedures
used and whether the technique is
considered partial or total.
Quality of assay
data and
laboratory tests
Verification of
sampling and
assaying
For geophysical tools, spectrometres,
handheld XRF instruments, etc, the
parametres used in determining the
analysis including instrument make and
model, reading times, calibrations factors
applied and their derivation, etc.
Nature of quality control procedures
adopted (e.g. standards, blanks,
duplicates, external laboratory checks) and
whether acceptable levels of accuracy (i.e.
lack of bias) and precision have been
established.
All results are historical in nature. No sampling by
LGM has been conducted on the tenement.
The verification of significant intersections
by either independent or alternative
company personnel.
All results are historical in nature. No sampling by
LGM has been conducted on the tenement.
The use of twinned holes.
No drilling by LGM has been conducted on the
tenements. Historical drilling (AC, RC & Diamond) has
been conducted across the project area, the
verification and validation of these data sets is
ongoing.
Documentation of primary data, data entry
procedures, data verification, data storage
(physical and electronic) protocols.
All available raw data is publicly available data and
copies are kept by Legacy Minerals Holdings Ltd.
Discuss any adjustment to assay data.
Accuracy and quality of surveys used to
locate drill holes (collar and down‐hole
surveys), trenches, mine workings and
other locations used in Mineral Resource
estimation.
Location of data
points
All results are historical in nature. No sampling by
LGM has been conducted on the tenement.
All results are historical in nature. No sampling by
LGM has been conducted on the tenement.
Historical data:
Specification of the grid system used.
Quality and adequacy of topographic
control.
Data spacing for reporting of Exploration
Results.
Data spacing
and distribution
No drilling by LGM has been conducted on the
tenements. Historical drilling (AC, RC & Diamond) has
been conducted across the project area, the
verification and validation of these data sets is
ongoing.
No drilling by LGM has been conducted on the
tenements. Historical drilling (AC, RC & Diamond) has
been conducted across the project area, the
verification and validation of these data sets is
ongoing.
No geophysical surveying by LGM has been conducted
on the tenements. Historical geophysical surveys have
been conducted across the project area, the
verification and validation of these data sets is
ongoing.
Whether the data spacing and distribution
is sufficient to establish the degree of
geological and grade continuity
appropriate for the Mineral Resource and
Ore Reserve estimation procedure(s) and
All data was collected and recorded in AGD66 zone
56. The location of the surveys is considered to be
adequately established and consistent with industry
standards.
Using government data topography and 2017 DTM
data. A topographic surface has been created using
this elevation data.
All results are historical in nature. No sampling by
LGM has been conducted on the tenement.
All results are historical in nature. No sampling by
LGM has been conducted on the tenement.
SIGN UP TO LEGACY MINERALS’
INTERACTIVE INVESTOR HUB
ASX: LGM
Page 12 of 16
classifications applied. Whether sample
compositing has been applied.
Orientation of
data in relation
to geological
structure
Sample security
Audits or
reviews
Whether sample compositing has been
applied.
No compositing has been applied to the exploration
results.
Whether the orientation of sampling
achieves unbiased sampling of possible
structures and the extent to which this is
known, considering the deposit type.
All geophysical data was orientated perpendicular to
known stratigraphy.
If the relationship between the drilling
orientation and the orientation of key
mineralised structures is considered to
have introduced a sampling bias, this
should be assessed and reported if
material.
All results are historical in nature. No sampling by
LGM has been conducted on the tenement.
The measures taken to ensure sample
security.
All results are historical in nature. No sampling by
LGM has been conducted on the tenement.
The results of any audits or reviews of
sampling techniques and data.
No audits of sampling techniques and data have been
completed.
External reviews of QAQC data have not identified any
significant issues regarding a review of procedures
relating to sampling techniques.
Section 2 Reporting of Exploration Results
(Criteria in this section apply to all succeeding section)
Criteria
JORC Code Explanation
Mineral
Tenement and
Land Status
Type, name/reference number, location and
ownership including agreements or material
issues with third parties including joint
ventures, partnerships, overriding royalties,
native title interests, historical sites,
wilderness or national park and environmental
settings.
The security of the tenure held at the time of
reporting along with any known impediments
to obtaining a licence to operate in the area.
Exploration
Done by Other
Parties
Geology
Acknowledgment and appraisal of exploration
by other parties.
Deposit type, geological setting and style of
mineralisation
Share your feedback
Discover