Announcement PDF ASX Announcement 14 August 2025 Initial Drilling Assays Returned and Further Drilling Planned at Thomson First drill assays and pathfinder elements encourage further drill testing Initial Drilling Results - F4 and Cut B • Recent diamond drilling at the Cut-B and F4 anomalies has intersected encouraging zones of silver (up to 20g/t Ag), tungsten (up to 0.48% W), base metals (up to 0.49% Zn) and elevated gold (up to 0.2g/t Au) associated with quartz-sulphide veins. • The extensive hydrothermal alteration and veins observed in drill core at both anomalies and intrusion-related gold (IRG) and Cu distal element pathfinder assemblages (W-Ag-Zn-As) continue to support the potential of the district to host a large, intrusion-related system. • The identified mineral zones demonstrate the presence of a large-scale, IRG system at the F4 and Cut-B Anomaly, with strong evidence suggesting the extensive hydrothermal alteration and veins observed in drill core at both anomalies and IRG-Cu distal element pathfinder assemblages (W-Ag-ZnAs) continue to support the potential of the district to host a large Intrusion-Related System. Upcoming Drilling • Follow-up drilling at the Cut-A anomaly that recently returned widespread gold mineralisation, including 377m and 0.1g/t Au (no cut-off) from 225m (CUTAD01) i,1. • First testing of the Cut-A, Cut-AC, and Cut-C anomalies is also planned for completion in Q4. • Follow-up drilling is planned at F4 and Cut B after further geophysical review. • Drilling approvals have been received from the NSW Government. Discovery Opportunity The Thomson Project shares similar characteristics with other major IRG-Cu districts, such as the Paterson Province in WA, where recent major IRG-Cu discoveries have been made at Winu (2.8Mt Cu, 8Moz Au, 51Moz Ag) ii and Havieron (7Moz Au, 0.3Mt Cu) iii. Management comment Legacy Minerals CEO & Managing Director, Christopher Byrne said: “Our first diamond drilling program at the Thomson Project encountered wide zones of IRG-Cu pathfinder elements at both targets. The results give us confidence that the overall system remains highly prospective for large-scale mineral discoveries across dozens of targets that remain untested. The recent drilling has intercepted zones elevated in pathfinder elements that are characteristic of the distal assemblages associated with gold-copper mineralisation seen in large intrusion-related deposits, such as Havieron. The results also support the observations of widespread hydrothermal alteration and veining, suggesting that we are in a district that can host extensive mineral systems. We are exploring a new frontier, being the first company to drill test some of these large geophysical anomalies and pursue the opportunity for a significant new gold and copper discovery. Legacy Minerals has received NSW Government approvals for follow-up drill testing of the Cut-A anomaly, which returned large zones of gold mineralisation, as well as for first-pass drill testing of the Cut-AC and Cut-C anomalies. This is planned to commence at the beginning of Q4.” 1. See ‘Endnotes’ on Page 19 for references Page 1 of 19 | ABN 43 650 398 897 3/202 Russell Street Bathurst, 2795 www.legacyminerals.com.au ASX: LGM Page 2 of 19 Legacy Minerals Holdings Limited (ASX: LGM, Legacy Minerals or the Company) is pleased to advise that the first two drill hole assays have returned, and further drilling is planned into copper-gold targets at its Thomson Project (EL9190, EL9194 and EL9728) in NSW, Australia. Thomson Project – Priority Targets Figure 1. Thomson Project overview showing and examples of “bullseye” magnetic targets (inset), including the priority drilling targets Cut-A, Cut-AC, and Cut-C. Cut-B Anomaly Drilling Diamond drill-hole CBDD004 was designed to test a coincident elevated gravity and magnetic anomaly which strikes east-to-west over approximately 900m and is considered prospective for IRG-Cu mineralisation. Drilling successfully tested the modelled magnetic and gravity target with observations and magnetic susceptibility measurements indicating that hydrothermal pyrrhotite-bearing quartz veins have caused the magnetic feature. Previous drilling at the CutBD02 Anomaly intersected approximately 300m of silica-albite +/- tourmalinebiotite alteration, delivering several high-grade intervals with highlight assays including: • 1m at 6.73g/t Au from 370m, • 1m at 497g/t Ag, 0.13% Nb from 392m, • 0.7m at 112g/t Ag, 0.5% Cu, 4.2% Zn and 0.4%Sn from 411m. The drill hole intersected overlying sediments of the Eromanga Basin to a depth of 84.2m below ground level with diamond drilling, extending into the interpreted Cambrian metasediment basement sequence from 84.2m to 600.2m below ground level. The hole encountered widespread pyrrhotite and pyrite-bearing quartz-carbonate veins and breccia. Variable hornfelsing of the metasediments occurred throughout the drill-hole, with silicification, sericite and albite alteration occurring locally, corresponding with increased vein density. SIGN UP TO LEGACY MINERALS’ INTERACTIVE INVESTOR HUB ASX: LGM Page 3 of 19 Figure 2. Cut-B plan view showing 3D magnetic inversion model anomaly shells (Red >0.007 SI) and gravity inversion modelled density shells (green >2.78) with drilling and aerial imagei, iv. 3F The hole returned highly anomalous distal pathfinder elements, suggesting they have been sourced from an IRG-Cu mineral system. These pathfinder intercepts include: • 2m at 19.65g/t Ag, 5.77ppm Sb from 190m • 2m at 0.11% W from 194m • 2m at 2,290ppm As, 4.5ppm Sb from 234m • 2m at 1,645ppm As from 270m • 2m at 0.21g/t Au, 7.66ppm Sb from 280m • 6m at 0.20% W from 310m incl. o • 2m at 0.11% W from 310m o 2m at 0.48% W from 314m o 2m at 15.35g/t Ag, 0.33% W from 380m 4m at 12.10g/t Ag, 0.23% W from 380m incl. o 2m at 8.84g/t Ag, 0.13% W from 382m • 2m at 2,710ppm As from 422m • 2m at 7,350ppm As, 4.77ppm Sb from 432m SIGN UP TO LEGACY MINERALS’ INTERACTIVE INVESTOR HUB ASX: LGM Page 4 of 19 Figure 3. Cut-B anomaly cross section showing 3D magnetic inversion model anomaly shells (Red >0.006 SI units) and gravity anomaly modelled density shells (green >2.78 mGal) with historic drilling and surface showing magnetic RTP (section 249750mE, MGA94 z55 looking East with a 200m slice width)iv,i. The large target area has only limited drill testing, this hole being only the fourth into this highly prospective area. The Company will further assess the results in conjunction with the geophysical datasets to assess the next steps required to delineate targets for follow-up drilling. F4 Anomaly Drilling Diamond drill-hole F4DD001 was designed to test the F4 magnetic anomaly for IRG-Cu mineralisation. Drilling successfully tested the modelled magnetic and gravity target with observations and magnetic susceptibility measurements indicating that hydrothermal pyrrhotite-bearing quartz veins have caused the magnetic feature. The drill-hole intersected overlying sediments of the Eromanga to 88.8m drill depth, with diamond drilling into the interpreted Cambrian metasediment basement sequence from 88.8m to 460.3m down-hole. The hole encountered four main styles of quartz veining, including bucky quartz-pyrrhotite, laminated quartz-pyrrhotite, stockwork quartz and quartz-pyrite veins. Variable hornfelsing of the metasediments occurred throughout the hole, with silicification and sericite alteration occurring locally, corresponding with increased quartz vein density. The hole returned anomalous distal pathfinder elements suggesting they been sourced from an IRG-Cu mineral system at depth. SIGN UP TO LEGACY MINERALS’ INTERACTIVE INVESTOR HUB ASX: LGM Page 5 of 19 The 3D modelling of the airborne magnetic data and ground gravity data defined discrete, coincident zones of elevated magnetic and gravity responses like those observed at the Cut-A anomaly, where widespread gold mineralisation has been identified (377m at 0.1g/t Au (no cut-off) from 225m, CutAD001). This is the first drill-hole to be completed into the F4 target, which comprises a shallow 3km long magnetic anomaly. The Company will further assess the results in conjunction with the geophysical datasets to assess the next steps required to delineate targets for follow-up drilling. Figure 4. Plan view of the F4 magnetic anomaly shells (Red >0.006 SI units) and gravity anomaly modelled density shells (green >2.72 mGal), projected to the surface with completed drillhole over aerial imagei,iv. Figure 5. Sectional view of the F4 magnetic anomaly shells (Red >0.006 SI) and gravity anomaly modelled density shells (green >2.72 mGal) with completed drill holei,iv SIGN UP TO LEGACY MINERALS’ INTERACTIVE INVESTOR HUB ASX: LGM Page 6 of 19 Next Steps Legacy Minerals plans for the first-ever testing of the Cut-AC, Cut-C and Cut-A anomalies, which is scheduled for completion in Q4. Follow-up drilling is also planned at F4 and Cut B after further geophysical review and interpretation of the pathfinder mineralisation intercepted in the two holes drilled. Government approval has been received for this follow-up drilling, and drill plans are being finalised. Drill Target - Cut-A Anomalyi Recently reported intercepts from new assays at the anomaly include: • 377m at 0.1g/t Au (no cut-off) from 225m to 602m including, o o 11m at 0.8g/t Au from 287m (no cut-off) including,  3m at 1.6g/t Au from 283m, and  1m at 3.7g/t Au from 293m 41m at 0.4g/t Au from 420m (no cut-off) including,  8m at 0.5g/t Au from 420m, and  15m at 0.7g/t Au from 446m The Cut-A anomaly exhibits a coincident zone of elevated magnetic and gravity response that extends over a strike length of approximately 1,000m, in an east-west direction. Previous explorers completed a single line of induced polarisation dipole-dipole (DDIP) over the highest magnetic feature and identified a zone of increased chargeability coincident with the elevated magnetic data. This was followed up by a single 641.8m drill-hole. Drilling reached top of basement at 136m and continued in approximately 480m of strong to moderate silica-carbonate altered meta-siltstone dominated package with thin, frequent quartz veins. Quartz veins commonly contain pyrite and pyrrhotitebearing. Granodiorite was intercepted from 597m to the end-of-hole (at 641.8m)i. Figure 6. Cut-A anomaly cross section showing 3D magnetic inversion model anomaly shells (Red >0.0035 SI) and gravity anomaly modelled density shells (green >2.70 mGal) with historic drilling (Section 232946mE, MGA94 z55)i,iv *No cut-off grade applied. SIGN UP TO LEGACY MINERALS’ INTERACTIVE INVESTOR HUB ASX: LGM Page 7 of 19 Assay results from drill core sampling delivered a broad anomalous uncut interval of 377m at 0.1g/t Au (no cut-off) from 225m. Pathfinder elements are consistent with a reduced intrusion related gold model where gold correlates with Bi and Te in quartz veins and As, Sn and W are variably elevated. The target is interpreted to be open in all directions. Better results within this broad zone include: • • 7m at 1.2g/t Au and 658ppm Bi from 287m (uncut) including: o 3m at 1.6g/t Au and 935ppm Bi from 283m; and o 1m at 3.7g/t Au and 1670ppm Bi from 293m. 41.95m at 0.4g/t Au from 420m (uncut) including: o 8m at 0.5g/t Au from 420m including:  o 4m at 1g/t Au, 5.5g/t Ag and 940ppm Bi from 420m. 24.95m at 0.4g/t Au, 7.9g/t Ag from 437m including:  7.95m at 0.49g/t Au and 7.1g/t Ag from 446m including:  5.45m at 1.1g/t Au and 6.7g/t Ag from 448.55m. Figure 7. Plan view of the Cut-A magnetic anomaly shells (Red >0.001 SI) and gravity anomaly modelled density shells (green >2.69) over aerial imagei. SIGN UP TO LEGACY MINERALS’ INTERACTIVE INVESTOR HUB ASX: LGM Page 8 of 19 Thomson Project – Intrusion-Related Gold and Copper The Thomson Project is located west of Bourke and covers 5,500km2 of tenure under granted exploration licences, securing a belt-scale exploration opportunity. It is located near the southern margin of the Thomson Orogen, near the interpreted contact with the Lachlan Fold Belt and the Delamerian Orogen. The Thomson Orogen covers a large area of Queensland and north-western New South Wales, mostly under the cover of the Mesozoic Eromanga Basin. The dominant basement rocks are interpreted to consist of Cambrian to Ordovician volcanics, metamorphosed turbidite, siltstone, and slate that are intruded by Silurian to Devonian felsic and mafic igneous rocks. This interpretation is supported by: • Several deep stratigraphic drill holes, such as Tongo 1, Laurelvale 1, completed by the NSW Geological Survey (GSNSW) v. Historic drill holes completed by previous exploration companies. The incorporation and interpretation of regional geophysical data (aeromagnetic, gravity and seismic) conducted by the GSNSW with geology logged in drill holes. 3F4F • • The Thomson Project is covered by younger sediments that ranges up to 280m thick. These sediments are part of the Eromanga and the Surat Basin cover sequences. Historically, this cover has partly deterred previous exploration companies and has limited the recognition of the Thomson Orogen’s mineral potential. Importantly, historical work indicates that this cover sequence is geophysically transparent, with a number of the key geophysical targeting methods such as magnetics and gravity, providing highly useful and important data sets. The GSNSW has suggested that the basement rocks within the Thomson Orogen could hold similar mineral potential to the adjoining belts, including the base metal and gold endowment of the Lachlan Orogen to the south, which is estimated to contain over 80 million ounces of gold and 13 million tonnes of copper vi. A series of major, belt-scale faults are interpreted from regional magnetic and gravity data, which may have acted as major fluid flow conduits during both early extensions and later deformation of the belt. 5F SIGN UP TO LEGACY MINERALS’ INTERACTIVE INVESTOR HUB ASX: LGM Page 9 of 19 Approved by the Board of Legacy Minerals Holdings Limited. For more information: Investors: Chris Byrne CEO & Managing Director chris.byrne@legacyminerals.com.au +61 (0) 499 527 547 Media: Nicholas Read Read Corporate nicholas@readcorporate.com.au +61 (0) 419 929 046 DISCLAIMER AND PREVIOUSLY REPORTED INFORMATION Information in this announcement is extracted from reports lodged as market announcements referred to above and available on the Company’s website https://legacyminerals.com.au/. The Company confirms that it is not aware of any new information that materially affects the information included in the original market announcement and that all material assumptions and technical parameters underpinning the estimates in the relevant market announcement continue to apply and have not materially changed. This announcement contains certain forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are only predictions and are subject to risks, uncertainties and assumptions which are outside of the control of Legacy Minerals Holdings Limited (LGM). These risks, uncertainties and assumptions include commodity prices, currency fluctuations, economic and financial market conditions, environmental risks and legislative, fiscal or regulatory developments, political risks, project delay, approvals and cost estimates. Actual values, results or events may be materially different to those contained in this announcement. Given these uncertainties, readers are cautioned not to place reliance on forward-looking statements. Any forward-looking statements in this announcement reflect the views of LGM only at the date of this announcement. Subject to any continuing obligations under applicable laws and ASX Listing Rules, LGM does not undertake any obligation to update or revise any information or any of the forward-looking statements in this announcement to reflect changes in events, conditions or circumstances on which any forward-looking statements is based. COMPETENT PERSON’S STATEMENT The information in this Report that relates to Exploration Targets, Exploration Results, Mineral Resources or Ore Reserves is based on information compiled by Thomas Wall, a Competent Person who is a Member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists. Mr Wall is the Technical Director and a full-time employee of Legacy Minerals Pty Limited, the Company’s wholly-owned subsidiary, and a shareholder of the Company. Mr Wall has sufficient experience that is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity being undertaken to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 edition of the Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves. Mr Wall consents to the inclusion of the matters based on this information in the form and context in which it appears in this announcement. SIGN UP TO LEGACY MINERALS’ INTERACTIVE INVESTOR HUB ASX: LGM Page 10 of 19 About Legacy Minerals Legacy Minerals is an ASX-listed public company that has been exploring gold, copper, and base-metal projects in NSW since 2017. The Company has ten projects that present significant opportunities for shareholders. Au-Ag Black Range (EL9464, EL9589) Extensive low-sulphidation, epithermal system with limited historical exploration. Epithermal occurrences across 30km of strike. Cu-Au Rockley (EL8926) Cu-Au Drake (EL6273, EL9616, EL9727, ALA75) Large caldera (~150km2) with similar geological characteristics to other major Pacific Rim3 lowsulphidation deposits. Au-Cu (Pb-Zn) Cobar (EL9511) Helix JV Prospective for porphyry Cu-Au and situated in the Macquarie Arc Ordovician host rocks with historic highgrade copper mines. Undrilled targets next door to the Peak Gold Mines and along strike of the CSA copper mine. Au-Ag Bauloora (EL8994, EL9464) Newmont JV Au Harden (EL9657) Hilltops JV One of NSW’s largest low-sulphidation, epithermal systems with a 27km2 epithermal vein field. Substantial historical gold production from two high-grade and substantial orogenic systems. Cu-Au Glenlogan (EL9614) S2 Resources JV Au-Cu Fontenoy (EL8995) Earth AI JV Untested porphyry search space located 55kms from Australia’s largest porphyry complex, Cadia Valley. A highly prospective and underexplored area for PGE, Ni, Au and Cu mineralisation with significant drill intercepts. Cu-Au Thomson (EL9190, EL9194, EL9728) Ni-Co Nico Young (ELA6901) A new and unexplored Intrusion-related gold and copper system search space with numerous ‘bullseye’ magnetic and gravity anomalies that remain untested. One of the largest nickel deposits in Australia with significant counter-cyclical exposure. Figure 8. Location summary of Legacy Minerals’ Projects in NSW, Australia, and major mines and deposits SIGN UP TO LEGACY MINERALS’ INTERACTIVE INVESTOR HUB ASX: LGM Page 11 of 19 Appendix 1 – Thomson Drill Collar Information Table 1: Drill hole collar information Elevation (m) EOH (m) Dip Azimuth (True North) 6613449 Coordinate Reference System MGA94z54 88 460.3 -70 45 6607165 MGA94z55 91 600.2 -73 210 Hole ID Easting Northing F4DD001 772441 CBDD004 249848 Appendix 2 – Significant Drill Intercepts Table 2. Significant drilling assay intervals from the F4DD001 and CBDD004 drill holes. Hole ID From (m) To (m) F4DD001 CBDD004 CBDD004 CBDD004 CBDD004 CBDD004 CBDD004 Incl. and and CBDD004 CBDD004 CBDD004 Incl. and CBDD004 CBDD004 CBDD004 CBDD004 245 190 194 234 270 280 310 310 312 314 348 358 380 380 382 422 432 556 580 246 192 196 236 272 282 316 312 314 316 350 360 384 382 384 424 434 558 582 Down hole width (m) 1 2 2 2 2 2 6 2 2 2 2 2 4 2 2 2 2 2 2 Ag (ppm) Au (ppm) As (ppm) 0.1 19.65 2.58 3.86 0.96 1.9 0.73 1.3 0.44 0.46 8.42 4.07 12.10 15.35 8.84 0.25 0.64 7.56 0.37 0.057 0.018 0.021 0.016 0.004 0.21 0.013 0.023 0.011 0.006 0.004 0.003 0.03 0.032 0.03 0.009 0.015 <0.002 0.009 0.6 273 2.5 2290 1645 3.5 5.53 3 7 6.6 733 363 288 568 7 2710 7350 817 1015 Sb W (ppm) (ppm Zn (ppm) 0.13 5.77 0.46 4.5 2.11 7.66 0.61 0.54 0.55 0.73 1.15 0.49 0.78 0.96 0.59 1.46 4.77 0.71 3.23 3470 62 27 104 33 4880 50 28 44 77 3810 1740 158 94 222 42 83 257 90 8.1 43 1140 23.9 14.2 16.6 1986 1110 17 4830 40 75.8 2285 3270 1300 24.4 9.1 106 23.8 Section 1 Sampling Techniques and Data Criteria Sampling Techniques JORC Code Explanation Commentary Nature and quality of sampling (e.g., cut channels, random chips, or specific specialised industry standard measurement tools appropriate to the minerals under investigation, such as down hole gamma sondes, or handheld XRF instruments, etc). These examples should not be taken as limiting the broad meaning of sampling. Mud-rotary drilling was completed to fresh rock followed by NQ core (diameter: 45mm) to end of hole (EOH). LGM used a reputable drilling contractor, Ophir Drilling, with a suitable rig. Diamond drill core provide a high-quality sample that is logged for lithological, structural, geotechnical, and other attributes. Sub-sampling of the core is carried out as per industry best practice. SIGN UP TO LEGACY MINERALS’ INTERACTIVE INVESTOR HUB ASX: LGM Page 12 of 19 Include reference to measures taken to ensure sample representivity and the appropriate calibration of any measurement tools or systems used. Aspects of the determination of mineralisation that are Material to the Public Report. In cases where ‘industry standard’ work has been done this would be relatively simple (e.g. ‘reverse circulation drilling was used to obtain 1 m samples from which 3 kg was pulverised to produce a 30 g charge for fire assay’). In other cases more explanation may be required, such as where there is coarse gold that has inherent sampling problems. Unusual commodities or mineralisation types (e.g., submarine nodules) may warrant disclosure of detailed information. Downhole surveys of dip and azimuth were conducted every 30m using a downhole Gyro to detect deviations of the hole from the planned dip and azimuth. The drill‐hole collar locations are recorded using a hand‐ held GPS, which has an accuracy of +/‐ 5m. All drill‐hole collars may be surveyed to a greater degree of accuracy using a certified surveyor at a later date. An Olympus Vanta pXRF is used to spot analyse the drill core onsite. Readings are taken to help identify minerals and alteration with field calibration of the pXRF instrument using standards periodically performed. The handheld pXRF results are only used for preliminary assessment of element compositions, prior to the receipt of assay results from the certified laboratory. The drill core was orientated using suitable core orientation tool by the drilling contractor with LGM staff supervision. These orientations are extended onto the remainder of the core and meter marks for logging. The visible structural features (veins, bedding, foliation, faults) are measured against the core orientation marks. The drill core from both holes was cut in half using an autosaw and assayed at a certified assay laboratory, ALS Laboratories. Core was prepared for analysis by cutting along the longitudinal line and then samples numbered as per the pre-designed cutsheet. The core was selectively sampled down the drill string at 1m nominal intervals for F4DD001 and 2m composite intervals for CBDD004 across the mineralised zones, unless selected geological or mineralisation boundaries. A certified sample standard was inserted a minimum 1:50 samples. Standards may also be added according to geology. Where core was incompetent due to being transported cover or weathered rock, representative samples were collected along the axis of the core. The drill core was cut by competent LGM staff. Samples were transported to ALS Laboratory in Orange for assaying. Samples are crushed to 6mm and then pulverized to 85% passing 75 microns. A 50g split of the sample was fired assayed for gold. The lower detection limit for gold is 0.002 ppm, which is believed to be an appropriate detection level. All other elements including copper and base metals (total 47 element suite) are analysed using a 4-acid acid digest and an ICP finish (ALS code: ME-MS61 + AuAA21). Assay standards, blanks and duplicates were analysed as part of the standard laboratory analytical procedures. Company standards SIGN UP TO LEGACY MINERALS’ INTERACTIVE INVESTOR HUB ASX: LGM Page 13 of 19 were introduced into the sampling at a ratio minimum of 1 standard for every 50 samples. Sample length: Core is sampled in 0.2m to 2m sample interval lengths except for minor changes due to geological or mineralisation boundaries. Pulps are retained by LGM for potential follow-up analysis. Drilling techniques Drill type (e.g., core, reverse circulation, open‐hole hammer, rotary air blast, auger, Bangka, sonic, etc) and details (e.g., core diametre, triple or standard tube, depth of diamond tails, facesampling bit or other type, whether core is oriented and if so, by what method, etc). Method of recording and assessing core and chip sample recoveries and results assessed. Drill sample recovery Measures taken to maximise sample recovery and ensure representative nature of the samples. Whether a relationship exists between sample recovery and grade and whether sample bias may have occurred due to preferential loss/gain of fine/coarse material. Whether core and chip samples have been geologically and geotechnically logged to a level of detail to support appropriate Mineral Resource estimation, mining studies and metallurgical studies. Logging Whether logging is qualitative or quantitative in nature. Core (or costean, channel, etc) photography. The total length and percentage of the relevant intersections logged. Sub‐sampling techniques and sample preparation If core, whether cut or sawn and whether quarter, half or all core taken. Diamond drilling using industry standard techniques. Mud rotary to refusal (commonly fresh rock) and NQ3 (45mm) to end of hole (EOH). Core recoveries were recorded during drilling and reconciled during the core processing and geological logging. Core is measured and marked after each drill run using wooden blocks calibrating depth. To date, minimal sample recovery issues have been identified that would impact on potential sample bias in the competent fresh rocks that host the mineralised intervals. Systematic geological and geotechnical logging was undertaken. Data collection where appropriate includes: • Nature and extent of lithologies. • Relationship between lithologies. • Amount and mode of occurrence of ore minerals. • Location, extent and nature of structures such as bedding, cleavage, veins, faults etc. Structural data (alpha & beta) are recorded for orientated core. • Geotechnical data is collected as required including recovery, RQD, fracture frequency, qualitative IRS, microfractures, veinlets and number of defect sets. For some geotechnical holes the orientation, nature of defects and defect fill may be recorded. • Representative bulk density by Archimedes principle may be taken. • Magnetic susceptibility recorded at 1m intervals for some holes as an orientation and alteration characterisation tool. Logging records lithology, mineralogy, mineralisation, veins, structures, weathering, colour and other noticeable features. This is generally qualitative except for % of sulphides and vein mineral content. Core trays are photographed in wet form. All drill holes are geologically logged in full. Core is being cut using a conventional automatic core saw with core holding support. All samples are collected from the same side of drill core where possible. A half-core sample was submitted for assay analysis. Where core was incompetent due to being transported cover, weathered rock, or soft rock due to faulting, representative SIGN UP TO LEGACY MINERALS’ INTERACTIVE INVESTOR HUB ASX: LGM Page 14 of 19 If non‐core, whether riffled, tube sampled, rotary split, etc and whether sampled wet or dry. For all sample types, the nature, quality and appropriateness of the sample preparation technique. Quality control procedures adopted for all subsampling stages to maximise representivity of samples. Measures taken to ensure that the sampling is representative of the in-situ material collected, including for instance results for field duplicate/second‐half sampling. Whether sample sizes are appropriate to the grain size of the material being sampled. Quality of assay data and laboratory tests The nature, quality and appropriateness of the assaying and laboratory procedures used and whether the technique is considered partial or total. For geophysical tools, spectrometres, handheld XRF instruments, etc, the parametres used in determining the analysis including instrument make and model, reading times, calibrations factors applied and their derivation, etc. samples were collected along the axis of the core. This information is recorded in the cutsheet and loaded into database. Not applicable as results are for core drilling. Drill core is cut in half along the length and the total half core submitted as the sample. This procedure meets industry standards where approximately 50% of the total sample taken from the diamond core is submitted. All mineralised intervals and surrounding wall rock were submitted for assay. Sample weights are recorded by the lab. Samples are delivered by Legacy Minerals Holdings personnel to ALS Minerals Laboratory, Orange NSW. Sample preparation will comprise of an industry standard of drying, jaw crushing and pulverising to -75 microns (85% passing) (ALS code PUL-23). Pulverisers are washed with QAQC tests undertaken (PUL-QC). Samples are dried, crushed and pulverized to produce a homogenous representative sub‐sample for analysis. Quality control procedures include submission of Certified Reference Materials (standards) and duplicates with each sample batch. QAQC results are routin