Announcement PDF ASX ANNOUNCEMENT 16 MAR 2022 Large Low Sulphidation System Highlighted by GA-IP Survey New areas of interest identified sub-parallel to known gold veining at Bauloora Project “Au-Ag mineralisation, scale, alteration and preservation” • The Company has completed a large 81km, 50m line spaced gradient array induced polarisation (GA-IP) survey at the Bauloora Project. • The GA-IP encompassed the northern section of a 4km by 2km zone of elevated gold-in-rock chip samples (>0.1g/t Au). • Interpretation of the results by GeoDiscovery Group and the Company has highlighted numerous prospective areas. • These targets may represent disseminated sulphides (chargeable) or quartz veins and/or silica alteration (resistive). • These areas are defined by significant chargeable and resistive targets (Figure 1) that, in places, directly correlate to the known mineralisation at the Mee Mar Prospect (quartzcarbonate-adularia veins) and Bauloora East Prospect (carbonate base-metal veins) giving encouragement to newly defined highly prospective areas along strike and sub-parallel. • Results indicate chargeable and resistivity targets are open along strike and to the east. • Newly identified chargeable features coincide with historical shallow reverse circulation (RC) drilling that intercepted up to 3m at 1.13g/t Au, 15.8g/t Ag, 34ppm Hg and 7.2% Pb+Zn from 69m1. Management Comment Legacy Minerals Managing Director, Christopher Byrne said: “Our recently completed GA-IP survey has contributed significantly to our interpreted prospectivity at the Bauloora Project. The survey forms part of our approach to systematically explore and drill the Project and we are excited to see the early fruits of this work. The GA-IP survey focused on the northern section of an 8km2 anomalous gold zone, and the findings of this survey are highly significant for Legacy Minerals. The survey results support a correlation of identified target areas with historical gold in drill intersections. The important implication of this correlation with gold mineralisation, is that the survey has defined similar chargeability and resistivity responses over a 2km strike length that has seen virtually no drilling. Importantly, what we see in the Bauloora Project is all the right ingredients for a significant lowsulphidation epithermal discovery: extensive gold and silver mineralisation, scale, alteration and system preservation.” ABN 43 650 398 897 Level 7, 1 Margaret Street Sydney ASX: LGM Page 1 of 13 www.legacyminerals.com.au Figure 1: GA-IP chargeability, prospects, drill holes, and rock chip photo locations Page 2 of 13 | ABN 43 650 398 897 Level 7, 1 Margaret Street Sydney www.legacyminerals.com.au ASX: LGM Results and Implications The GA-IP survey has defined a large area which exhibits elevated and anomalous chargeability and resistivity responses over a 2km strike length. Zones of elevated chargeability and resistivity are found proximal to interpreted and known veins and mineralisation within the Bethungra and Cowcumbala Volcanics (Figures 2 - 6). Results returned from the GA-IP survey indicate correlation between chargeability and observed clay alteration in the Bethungra volcanics, as well as with historical Mee Mar prospecting pits (Figures 4 & 5) and mapped veining that has strong gold, silver and base-metal intersections reported in historic drill holes (e.g. HB4: 3m at 1.13g/t Au, 15.8g/t Ag and 7.2% Pb+Zn from 69m). Chargeable anomalies within the Bethungra rhyolites and dacites that have been identified in the central and western parts of survey area are of significant interest as they present a contrast to the interpreted resistive bedrock lithology. Resistive anomalies have also been shown to occur with known veining and surface gold mineralisation at Bauloora North (Figures 2 & 3), the Mee Mar vein and at Bauloora East (Figure 6). Resistive anomalies may represent quartz veining and/or zones of silica alteration associated with gold and silver mineralisation. These resistive targets may represent the response of an extensive low-sulphidation quartz-carbonate vein system. Target areas of interest extend along strike (north and south) and to the east of the current survey. The Company is currently assessing plans to extend the survey to these areas in the future. The limited drilling at the Bauloora project and the anomalies defined through the GA-IP survey have highlighted the untested prospectivity. Significantly, the Company interprets high levels of the low sulphidation system to be preserved due to the presence of sinter related lithology, and diagnostic vein textures and geochemistry. This Project therefore, represents an excellent opportunity for a shallow high-grade gold and silver discovery to be made. Grab Sample Rock Textures Figure 2 and Figure 3: Crustiform quartz-carbonate veins with botryoidal and mamillary textures and bladed calcite pseudomorph’s in quartz. Page 3 of 13 | ABN 43 650 398 897 Level 7, 1 Margaret Street Sydney www.legacyminerals.com.au ASX: LGM Figure 4: Lattice bladed carbonate intergrown with crustiform carbonate banding above quartz breccia clasts cemented within fine grained quartz carbonate matrix (Mee Mar mullock). Figure 5: Lattice bladed carbonate and pseudobladed quartz occurring with colloform chalcedony and boxwork textured (after sulphide) layers (Mee Mar mullock). Page 4 of 13 | ABN 43 650 398 897 Level 7, 1 Margaret Street Sydney www.legacyminerals.com.au ASX: LGM Figure 6: White to pale yellow low Fe sphalerite and galena within quartz-carbonate veins hosted in intensely chlorite altered conglomerate (Bauloora East mullock). Gradient Array Induced Polarisation Gradient array is an efficient way to map horizontal variations in subsurface resistivity and chargeability. Resistive highs may represent zones of silica alteration and quartz veining that may be associated with gold and silver. Chargeability highs potentially represent zones of disseminated sulphides such as pyrite or arsenopyrite that may be associated with mineralisation. GA-IP is often used as a first pass to highlight general regions of chargeable or resistive response, then dipole-dipole (DP-DP) or pole-dipole (P-DP) surveys are commonly completed to provide additional depth penetration to target drill holes. No depth information is acquired with gradient array set-up however the significant benefit is its ability to cover a large area of ground quickly and cost effectively. Legacy Minerals retained Fender Geophysics Pty Ltd to complete a total of 81km of surveying over the Company’s Bauloora Project. This was to forward the Companies systematic exploration strategy at the project and build upon the results of the ground magnetic survey. The survey covered the majority of the known Mee Mar strike length and prospects including Bauloora East and Bauloora North within the northern portion of the gold anomalous zone. The GA-IP data received is of good quality and data interpretation remains ongoing. The data was acquired in 4 blocks as shown in Figure 8. Each data block measures 1km x 1km with potential electrodes located 2km apart (500m to the east and west of each data block). Some survey stations overlap between blocks has been incorporated in the design to allow for data continuity. Stations were acquired at 25m intervals along on E-W lines 50m apart. Page 5 of 13 | ABN 43 650 398 897 Level 7, 1 Margaret Street Sydney www.legacyminerals.com.au ASX: LGM A number of readings were taken and the final field data was assessed in the software program TQIP (by Scientific Computing and Applications). IP decays were compiled and inspected for each reading in Geosoft. Sub-standard (i.e., non-monotonically decreasing, negative or excessively erratic) decays were rejected and multiple readings averaged. A representative chargeability decay was calculated for all suitable decays. A number of fences are located in the region and may affect the results. Around 5% of points were rejected (mostly the spuriously high but repeatable IP decays occurring near marked fences). The fences have been plotted from points supplied by Fender Geophysics. Anomalies proximal to culture are treated with caution. Drilling Completed – Mt Felstead Ten RC holes have been completed at the Mt Felstead Project with intersections of vein-hosted base-metal mineralisation up to 10m down-hole width2 including zones of semi-massive sulphides. All holes have been dispatched and assay results are pending with results expected within 8 weeks. The holes ranged from 120 to 220 metres depth and the interpreted position of the mineralised structure was intercepted in nine of the ten holes. Host rocks were variably silicified rhyodacite tuffs, with sericite alteration noted in association with shearing and chlorite alteration increasing in intensity adjacent to quartz-carbonate veins. Sulphides were observed to occur with quartz-carbonate veining. These veins consisted primarily of finegrained yellow sphalerite and fine grained “sooty” galena with minor chalcopyrite and disseminated pyrite interpreted to be of a similar mineralisation style to that historical mined at Mt Felstead (Figure 7). The drilling tested down dip of known mineralisation and along a 650m strike of historically mined mineralisation and anomalous soil geochemistry1. The Mt Felstead Prospect exhibits carbonate base metal epithermal-style gold-silver mineralisation which historically reported bonanza Ag and highgrade Au with historic face sampling assays up to 3,701g/t Ag, 6.9g/t Au, 55% Pb+Zn, and 6.4% Cu (20cm face grab sample) 1. The Company looks forward to updating the market on the results once they return. Page 6 of 13 | ABN 43 650 398 897 Level 7, 1 Margaret Street Sydney www.legacyminerals.com.au ASX: LGM Figure 7: Crustiform veining in silica–sulphide and copper carbonate veins within jigsaw-fit textured breccia adjacent sericite altered dacite (Mt Felstead Mine mullock) Next Steps at the Bauloora Project The significance of the results from the GA-IP survey, when combined with known anomalism and alteration, has increased the prospectivity at the Bauloora Project. The Company is now prioritising follow-up work to define further drill targets at the project including: • large soil geochemistry program; and • ground truthing GA-IP and reconnaissance rock chip sampling. The Company will be completing down hole electromagnetic (DHEM) surveying at the Mt Felstead Mine prospect with three initial holes be surveyed in early April. If results are encouraging and the survey technique is deemed appropriate for helping target Mt Felstead style of mineralisation the DHEM surveys will be expanded to the remaining RC holes. The Company has planned and budgeted for ~5,000m of RC drilling across the Bauloora Project. To date the company has completed 1,541m of drilling at Mt Felstead. Page 7 of 13 | ABN 43 650 398 897 Level 7, 1 Margaret Street Sydney www.legacyminerals.com.au ASX: LGM Figure 8: GA-IP survey area and location of elevated gold-in-rock samples, Bauloora Project. Page 8 of 13 | ABN 43 650 398 897 Level 7, 1 Margaret Street Sydney www.legacyminerals.com.au ASX: LGM Approved by the board of Legacy Minerals Holdings Limited. For more information: Chris Byrne CEO & Managing Director chris.byrne@legacyminerals.com.au +61 (0) 499 527 547 Victoria Humphries Media & Investor Relations victoria@nwrcommunications.com.au +61 (0) 431 151 676 REFERENCED DOCUMENTS 1. 2. Company’s Prospectus dated 28 July 2021; LGM ASX Announcement 24 Feb 2022: Maiden Drilling Intersects Semi-Massive Sulphides DISCLAIMER & COMPETENT PERSONS STATEMENT Information in this announcement is extracted from reports lodged as market announcements referred to above and available on the Company’s website https://legacyminerals.com.au/. The Company confirms that it is not aware of any new information that materially affects the information included in the original market announcement and that all material assumptions and technical parameters underpinning the estimates in the relevant market announcement continue to apply and have not materially changed. This announcement contains certain forward-looking statements. Forward looking statements are only predictions and are subject to risks, uncertainties and assumptions which are outside of the control of Legacy Minerals Holdings Limited (LGM). These risks, uncertainties and assumptions include commodity prices, currency fluctuations, economic and financial market conditions, environmental risks and legislative, fiscal or regulatory developments, political risks, project delay, approvals and cost estimates. Actual values, results or events may be materially different to those contained in this announcement. Given these uncertainties, readers are cautioned not to place reliance on forward-looking statements. Any forward-looking statements in this announcement reflect the views of LGM only at the date of this announcement. Subject to any continuing obligations under applicable laws and ASX Listing Rules, LGM does not undertake any obligation to update or revise any information or any of the forward-looking statements in this announcement to reflect changes in events, conditions or circumstances on which any forward-looking statements is based. The information in this report that relates to Exploration Targets, Exploration Results, Mineral Resources or Ore Reserves is based on information compiled by Thomas Wall, a Competent Person who is a Member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists. Mr Wall is the Technical Director is a full-time employee of Legacy Minerals Limited and a shareholder, who has sufficient experience that is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity being undertaken to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 edition of the Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves. Mr Wall consents to the inclusion in the report of the matters based on his information in the form and context in which it appears in this announcement. Page 9 of 13 | ABN 43 650 398 897 Level 7, 1 Margaret Street Sydney www.legacyminerals.com.au ASX: LGM About Legacy Minerals Legacy Minerals is an ASX listed public Company that has been involved in the acquisition and exploration of gold, copper, and base-metal projects in the Lachlan Fold Belt since 2017. The Company has five wholly owned and unencumbered tenements that present significant discovery opportunities. Au-Cu (Pb-Zn) Cobar (EL8709, EL9256) Au Harden (EL8809, EL9257) Undrilled targets next door to the Peak Gold Mines with several priority geophysical anomalies Late time AEM conductors, IP anomaly, and magnetic targets Geochemically anomalous - gold in lag up to 1.55g/t Au Large historical high-grade quartz-vein gold mineralisation open along strike and down plunge. Significant drill intercepts include 3.6m at 21.7g/t Au 116m and 2m at 19.09g/t Au from 111m Au-Ag Bauloora (EL8994) Au-Cu Fontenoy (EL8995) A 27km2 hydrothermal alteration area large containing low-sulphidation epithermal-style gold silver targets. Historical bonanza grades at the Mt Felstead Prospect included 3,701g/t Ag, 6.9g/t Au, 29% Pb, 26% Zn, and 6.4% Cu (20cm grab sample) The Project exhibits a greater than 8km long zone of Au and Cu anomalism defined in soil sampling and drilling. Significant drill intercepts include 79m at 0.27% Cu from 1.5m Cu-Au Rockley (EL8296) Sn-Ni-Cu Mulholland (EL9330) Prospective for porphyry Cu-Au and situated in the Macquarie Arc Ordovician host rocks the project contains historic high-grade copper mines and rock chips up to 4.26% Cu and 90g/t Ag. Associated polymetallic mineralisation. There are several tin and nickel occurrences in the project area with trends up to 2.6km defined in drilling. Significant drill intercepts include 44m at 0.45% Ni Figure 9: Legacy Minerals’ Tenements, Lachlan Fold Belt NSW Page 10 of 13 | ABN 43 650 398 897 Level 7, 1 Margaret Street Sydney www.legacyminerals.com.au ASX: LGM Appendix 1 – JORC Code, 2021 Edition Table 1 Section 1 Sampling Techniques and Data Criteria JORC Code Explanation Commentary Nature and quality of sampling (e.g., cut channels, random chips, or specific specialised industry standard measurement tools appropriate to the minerals under investigation, such as down hole gamma sondes, or handheld XRF instruments, etc). These examples should not be taken as limiting the broad meaning of sampling. Gradient Array Induced Polarisation survey (GA-IP) method is often used to determine the location of disseminated sulphides. Rocks containing sulphide minerals can be more readily charged than barren ground. An external current is applied, and charge separation can occur on sulphide grain boundaries. When the transmitted current is switched off the decay of the current can be measured. Gradient array is an efficient way to map horizontal variations in subsurface resistivity and chargeability, but it is poor at resolving depth of anomaly. The IP survey was completed by Fender Geophysics. The oversight of the survey and auditing (QAQC) and processing of data acquired was conducted by the Fender Geophysics team and GeoDiscovery Group Pty Ltd. The GA-IP survey array used a GDD Tx 4 5kVA transmitter and a Scintrex IPR12 8-Channel receiver. The receiver dipole length was 25m and the transmitter dipole length 2000m. The time domain was 2s or 0.125Hz. Line Bearing was 90° Timing: 0.125Hz 50% duty-cycle (2 sec on/off time); 20 Rx windows from 590 - 1540 msec - Average Current 7 Amps Receiver Electrode Pots: Non-polarising porous pots Transmitter Electrode Plates: 120mm x 800mm x 5mm aluminium plate Rx Cables: Multi-core data cable Tx Wire: 2.5mm single-core wire Sampling Techniques Include reference to measures taken to ensure sample representivity and the appropriate calibration of any measurement tools or systems used. Data from the survey have been provided as finished products from GeoDiscovery Group Pty Ltd. Clean data from each of the four blocks was merged and gridded using a 15m cell size and minimum curvature routine. Field data was acquired by a geophysicist with the following verification processes in place: • Manual recording of station location, current output, primary voltage, resistivity and chargeability • Between 2 and 13 fold stacking for each reading, with visual inspection of individual decay stacks • Minimum of 3 readings per station, thus verifying repeatability of the recorded values Data and any cultural features were recorded in the operator’s field notes for review in conjunction with recorded in the operator’s field notes for review in conjunction with later quality control. Data was downloaded from the receiver at the end of each day. It then got uploaded to Data was downloaded from the receiver at the end of each day. It then got uploaded to secure Cloud secure Cloud storage. Further QA and processing of the data were completed of. Further QA and processing of the data were completed off--site by a second Drilling techniques Drill sample recovery Logging Sub‐sampling techniques and sample preparation Aspects of the determination of mineralisation that are Material to the Public Report. In cases where ‘industry standard’ work has been done this would be relatively simple (e.g. ‘reverse circulation drilling was used to obtain 1 m samples from which 3 kg was pulverised to produce a 30 g charge for fire assay’). In other cases more explanation may be required, such as where there is coarse gold that has inherent sampling problems. Unusual commodities or mineralisation types (e.g., submarine nodules) may warrant disclosure of detailed information. Drill type (e.g., core, reverse circulation, open‐hole hammer, rotary air blast, auger, Bangka, sonic, etc) and details (e.g., core diametre, triple or standard tube, depth of diamond tails, facesampling bit or other type, whether core is oriented and if so, by what method, etc). Method of recording and assessing core and chip sample recoveries and results assessed. Measures taken to maximise sample recovery and ensure representative nature of the samples. Whether a relationship exists between sample recovery and grade and whether sample bias may have occurred due to preferential loss/gain of fine/coarse material. Whether core and chip samples have been geologically and geotechnically logged to a level of detail to support appropriate Mineral Resource estimation, mining studies and metallurgical studies. Whether logging is qualitative or quantitative in nature. Core (or costean, channel, etc) photography. The total length and percentage of the relevant intersections logged. If core, whether cut or sawn and whether quarter, half or all core taken. If non‐core, whether riffled, tube sampled, rotary split, etc and whether sampled wet or dry. For all sample types, the nature, quality and geophysicist. The raw IP site by a second geophysicist. The raw IP data was assessed in TQIPdb for individual decay curves for each reading as well as for overall data quality. data was assessed in TQIPdb for individual decay curves for each reading as well as for overall data quality. The data was then exported in Geosoft ASCII format and loaded into Windisp for presentation as a raw data pseudosection. Not Applicable. Not Applicable. Not Applicable. Not Applicable. Not Applicable. Not Applicable. Not Applicable. Not Applicable. Not Applicable. Not Applicable. Not Applicable. Quality of assay data and laboratory tests Verification of sampling and assaying Location of data points Data spacing and distribution appropriateness of the sample preparation technique. Quality control procedures adopted for all subsampling stages to maximise representivity of samples. Measures taken to ensure that the sampling is representative of the in-situ material collected, including for instance results for field duplicate/second‐half sampling. Whether sample sizes are appropriate to the grain size of the material being sampled. The nature, quality and appropriateness of the assaying and laboratory procedures used and whether the technique is considered partial or total. For geophysical tools, spectrometres, handheld XRF instruments, etc, the parametres used in determining the analysis including instrument make and model, reading times, calibrations factors applied and their derivation, etc. Nature of quality control procedures adopted (e.g., standards, blanks, duplicates, external laboratory checks) and whether acceptable levels of accuracy (i.e., lack of bias) and precision have been established. The verification of significant intersections by either independent or alternative company personnel. The use of twinned holes. Documentation of primary data, data entry procedures, data verification, data storage (physical and electronic) protocols. Discuss any adjustment to assay data. Accuracy and quality of surveys used to locate drill holes (collar and down‐hole surveys), trenches, mine workings and other locations used in Mineral Resource estimation. Specification of the grid system used. Quality and adequacy of topographic control. Data spacing for reporting of Exploration Results. Whether the data spacing and distribution is sufficient to establish the degree of geological and grade continuity appropriate for the Mineral Resource and Ore Reserve estimation procedure(s) and classifications applied. Whether sample compositing has been applied. Whether sample compositing has been applied. Not Applicable. Not Applicable. Not Applicable. Not Applicable. Not Applicable. Not Applicable. Not Applicable. Not Applicable. Not Applicable. Not Applicable. GA-IP - The transmitter and receiver electrode positions are located to hand-held GPS accuracy, generally +-3m (UTM projection GDA94 Zone 55) using a Garmin 64s. The grid system used is WGS84 and may be transformed into GDA94, MGA Zone 55. Using government data topography and 2017 DTM data. A topographic surface has been created using this elevation data The data spacing has been designed to provide geophysical responses to the target mineralisation in line with industry standard parameters No mineral resource or reserve calculation has been applied No compositing has been applied to the exploration results. Orientation of data in relation to geological structure Sample security Audits or reviews Whether the orientation of sampling achieves unbiased sampling of possible structures and the extent to which this is known, considering the deposit type. If the relationship between the drilling orientation and the orientation of key mineralised structures is considered to have introduced a sampling bias, this should be assessed and reported if material. The measures taken to ensure sample security. The results of any audits or reviews of sampling techniques and data. The geophysical survey has been designed to be orthogonal to anticipated mineralisation. The features of interest resulting from the survey require drill testing to determine if they may relate to gold mineralisation. Not Applicable. Not Applicable. The data has been interpreted by Kate Nelson from GeoDiscovery Group Pty Ltd. Daily production was monitored by Fender Geophysics GeoDiscovery Group Pty Ltd. to ensure quality control. Section 2 Reporting of Exploration Results (Criteria in this section apply to all succeeding section) Criteria Mineral Tenement and Land Status Exploration Done by Other Parties Geology Drill hole Information Data aggregation methods JORC Code Explanation Commentary Type, name/reference number, location and ownership including agreements or material issues with third parties including joint ventures, partnerships, overriding royalties, native title interests, historical sites, wilderness or national park and environmental settings. The Bauloora Project is comprised of EL8994. The license is owned 100% by Legacy Minerals Pty Ltd (a fully owned subsidiary of Legacy Minerals Holdings Limited). There are no royalties or encumbrances over the tenement areas. The security of the tenure held at the time of reporting along with any known impediments to obtaining a licence to operate in the area. Acknowledgment and appraisal of exploration by other parties. Deposit type, geological setting and style of mineralisation A summary of all information material to the understanding of the exploration results including tabulation of the following information for all Material drill holes: • Easting and northing of the drill hole collar •Elevation or RL (Reduced Level – elevation above sea level in metres) of the drill hole collar • Dip and azimuth of the hole • Down hole length and interception depth • Hole length If the exclusion of this information is justified on the basis that the information is not Material and this exclusion does not detract from the understanding of the report, the Competent Person should clearly explain why this is the case. In reporting Exploration Results, weighting averaging techniques, maximum and/or minimum grade truncations (e.g., cutting of high grades) and cut‐off grades are usually Material and should be stated. Where aggregated intercepts incorporate short lengths of high-grade results and longer lengths of low-grade results, the procedure used for such aggregation should be stated and some typical The land is primarily freehold land. There are no native title interests in the license area. The GA-IP was planned by Legacy Minerals Holdings exploration staff in consultation with Geodiscovery Group and Fender Geophysics. The GA-IP was conducted by Fender Geophysics. Known mineralisation at the Bauloora project sits within the Silurian Frampton Volcanics and Devonian Bethungra Formation, Cowcumbala Rhyolite and Deep Gully Creek Conglomerate. The project is considered prospective for intermediate to low-sulphidation epithermal style gold-silver and base-metal mineralisation. See table 1 in the body of the article and reference documents Not applicable. Not applicable. Not applicable. Relationship between mineralisation widths and intercept lengths Diagrams Balanced Reporting Other substantive exploration data Further Work examples of such aggregations should be shown in detail. The assumptions used for any reporting of metal equivalent values should be clearly stated. These relationships are particularly important in the reporting of exploration results. If the geometry of the mineralisation with respect to the drill hole angle is known, its nature should be reported. If it is not known and only the down hole lengths are reported, there should be a clear statement to this effect. Appropriate maps and sections (with scales) and tabulations of intercepts should be included for any significant discovery being reported. These should include, but not be limited to a plane view of drill hole collar locations and appropriate sectional views. Where comprehensive reporting of all Exploration Results is not practical, representative reporting of both low and high grades and/or widths should be practiced to avoid misleading reporting of Exploration Results. Other exploration data, if meaningful and material, should be reported including (but not limited to): geological observation; geophysical survey results; geochemical survey results; bulk samples – size and method of treatment; metallurgical test results; bulk density, groundwater, geotechnical and rock characteristics; potential deleterious or contaminating substances. The nature and scale of planned further work (e.g., tests for lateral extensions or depth extensions or large – scale step – out drilling). Diagrams clearly highlighting the areas of possible extensions, including the main geological interpretations and future drilling areas, provided this information is not commercially sensitive. N